The sole agenda item was a discussion of awards to be
given at IALL 2001.� Read and David
presented their concerns regarding IALL awards.
1. � Lifetime Achievement Award
Read
presented the criteria for the award:��
(a) outstanding, quality service to IALL and the profession, (b)
over a sustained period of time, (c) and who is at or near the end of
his/her career.� The offer of airfare
and conference fees indicates the importance of bringing the recipient to
the conference to be recognized by his/her colleagues in a special
way.� There are no requirements the
award be presented at each conference.
Chris
raised concerns about how we surmise what constitutes the end of a
career.� Is there a semantics issue
with the word lifetime?�
Significant discussion followed as to what should constitute
criteria for this award, and whether any current members satisfy the
criteria.
�Read moved the Lifetime Achievement Award not be given
this year.� David seconded the
Motion.� There were two yes votes and
three abstentions.�
After
unfruitful discussion, Read suggested we consider forming an Awards
Committee to assist the Board in identifying individuals who meet the
criteria for this award.
�David moved each Board member nominate 0 to 2 people,
and forward nominations to Read for email distribution. Chris seconded the
Motion.� The Motion passed unanimously.
Read
and David suggested amending the wording in our award procedures to
indicate that the airfare/conference fee be offered but that a candidate
need not feel obligated to accept it if their travel is already covered by
their institution or if they wish to decline the financial assistance for
another reason.� Action was tabled
for further discussion at the Board and Council Meeting in Houston.
2.�
Henderson/Sheppard Awards.
As
voting for this award had taken place at a prior meeting, the recipients
of the Henderson and Sheppard Awards were confirmed to be Monika Dressler
(Michigan), and Gamin Bartle (Alabama).�
3. President's Award
Read
expressed his discomfort regarding providing a monetary gift for this
award. Lynne stressed her position that once the award cycle was begun, we
should not remove the monetary award from the process for this cycle.
Read
recommended Bruno Browning as the President's Award recipient; the Board
unanimously accepted his selection.�
�Read proposed we revert to an honorary rather than
monetary acknowledgement for the President's Award.� David seconded the Motion.�
Chris interceded to table the motion to a Board and Council discussion
and decision at the Annual Business Meeting. By a 4-1 margin the Board agreed
to table the vote on the Motion.
4.� Outstanding
Contribution Awards.
Read
and David presented their concerns regarding the recently enacted
Outstanding Contributions Awards.�
Using prepared documentation, they explained:
Our
criteria have not yet been clearly established.� It seems we were looking to fill in a missing gap, between
lifetime, and newcomer.�
Unfortunately we began to settle on various names before defining
the criteria, and also before discussing thoroughly the purpose and
effect.�
Some of our concerns are these: (a) Do members who do their work for IALL
expect an award for doing so?� Or
is unofficial, or even official (by way of letter) thanks enough?� (b) What do those individuals who work
hard but don't get recognized think when they're passed over? This may be
discouraging, when if fact the whole point of giving awards is to
encourage, not discourage. (c) What constitutes outstanding� (i.e., how does it differ from what
most of our hard working IALL members do?)� (d) What's the purpose of the monetary award?� It's not enough to really benefit the
member, other than being a token.�
Also, are we convinced that we can establish a long-term financial
commitment?� (e) How many such
awards make sense?� (f) What
mechanism do we use to identify candidates and select recipients?
Read
proposed we delay selecting recipients for this award this year, pending
discussion of the issues with the entire Council at Houston, including its
purpose, criteria, name of the award, and procedures.� David seconded the Motion.� The Motion passed with 4 affirmative
votes and one abstention.
Read
indicated if the Council decides to proceed with the award, his preference
would be to not attach a monetary gift to the award.� Chris urged the Board leave wait to
hear from the Council before setting parameters.�